Small Utility Vehicles Aren't As Rugged As Their Image Suggests
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety has found that seven small utility vehicles, all 1998 models, were excessively damaged in a series of four crash tests undertaken at 5mph.
The crash tests were performed to gauge how well bumpers can prevent damage in minor impacts. Only the Subaru Forester and Jeep Wrangler sustained less than $3,000 total damage. The worst performer, the Kia Sportage, allowed damage costing more than $7,000 to repair. The Sportage's average damage per test was more than $1,800.
"Only the Forester performed well in the relatively easy flat-barrier impacts. The rest of the vehicles should have done as well," said Brian O'Neill, president of the Institute. "And in the more demanding angle-barrier and pole tests, the bumpers on all of the small utility vehicles failed to prevent excessive damage. The cost to repair the damage to the Sportage after the four tests amounted to more than a third of the vehicle's purchase price."
O'Neill pointed out that manufacturers like to promote utility vehicles with an image of ruggedness. In doing so however, "the designers obviously paid little attention to the basic purpose of bumpers, which is to prevent damage in low-speed impacts," O'Neill said. "Instead, the designs of some of these vehicles guarantee increased damage in some crashes. Major culprits are the spare tires mounted on tailgates that protrude beyond the rear bumpers of most of the utility vehicles we testedall but the Forester and Jeep Cherokee. In some rear-end crashes, this design means that, instead of the bumper making the first contact, the spare tire takes the impact. This leads to unnecessary damage to rear windows and tailgates, and the result is thousands of dollars being spent for repairs."
None of the small utility vehicles tested sustained less than $1,000 damage in the rear-into-pole impact at 5 mph. The two vehicles that sustained more than $2,000 damage in this test have rear-mounted spare tires. The Sportage sustained almost $3,000 damage in this test alone. It sustained another $2,674 damage in the rear-into-flat-barrier impactby far the worst performance in this test.
The Institute's crash test series includes front and rear flat-barrier impacts plus two localized impacts, front-into-angle-barrier and rear-into-pole.